Can Private Foundations Make Loans?
Yes, private foundations can make loans under the right circumstances, much like other legal entities such as for-profit corporations or public charities. These loans can be made either to further the foundation's charitable mission or as an investment. However, whether the loan is made for a charitable purpose or as an investment, it must comply with strict regulations to avoid legal violations, such as self-dealing or jeopardizing investment rules. Generally speaking, loans that are not made for charitable purposes or sound investment reasons should be avoided.
Loans and the Charitable Mission
A private foundation’s primary purpose is to support charitable activities, and it is allowed to make loans that directly relate to or support its charitable mission. For example, a private foundation could offer a loan to a nonprofit organization to help fund a project that advances the foundation’s goals, such as building affordable housing or providing educational programs for underprivileged communities. However, such loans must carefully comply with the self-dealing rules, which prevent foundation insiders from financially benefiting from their position. Loans made for any personal benefit, even if indirectly, could violate these rules and result in penalties.
Loans as Investments
In addition to loans made for charitable purposes, private foundations can also make loans as part of their investment strategy. However, in such cases, the loan must meet good business standards and make sound financial sense. This means that the loan should be evaluated like any other prudent investment, with consideration of the borrower’s creditworthiness, repayment terms, and overall risk. The foundation must ensure that the loan aligns with its investment goals and provides a reasonable return, or at the very least, does not expose the foundation to undue financial risk.
When making loans as investments, private foundations must also be mindful of the jeopardizing investment rules. These rules prohibit foundations from making investments that could put their ability to carry out their charitable mission at risk. A loan might be considered a jeopardizing investment if the credit risk is too high, the interest rate is too low, or the loan size is disproportionately large compared to the foundation's overall portfolio. If a loan, or any investment, is deemed too risky and jeopardizes the foundation’s charitable purposes, both the foundation and its managers could face serious penalties. Therefore, careful evaluation of investment loans is critical to ensure they comply with these regulations and support the foundation’s long-term financial stability.
However, even if the loan meets sound investment criteria, it still must comply with the self-dealing rules.
Self-Dealing Rules and Loans to Disqualified Persons
Private foundations must be particularly cautious about self-dealing when making loans. Self-dealing occurs when a foundation engages in financial transactions with "disqualified persons," such as substantial contributors, foundation managers, or their family members. Loans to these individuals or entities are prohibited, regardless of how favorable the terms of the loan may be to the foundation.
Who are Disqualified Persons?
A disqualified person includes many people and legal entities closely associated with the foundation, such as:
• Substantial contributors to the foundation
• Foundation managers (e.g., officers or directors)
• Family members of substantial contributors or foundation managers
• Corporations, partnerships, or trusts in which a disqualified person holds a significant interest
Loans to these individuals or entities are prohibited, as this would violate the self-dealing rules. For instance, a foundation cannot lend money to a substantial donor or one of the foundation’s managers, even if the terms are favorable. Violating the self-dealing rules can result in significant penalties for both the foundation and the disqualified person involved.
Program-Related Investments (PRIs)
A notable carve-out in the rules for private foundations is the concept of program-related investments (PRIs). PRIs are investments—such as loans, equity investments, or other financial instruments—that serve charitable purposes and are not made with the primary goal of financial gain. A properly structured PRI counts as a charitable distribution in meeting the 5% required distribution rule.
For example, a private foundation could make a loan to a nonprofit organization that plans to build housing for women and children who are victims of domestic violence. Generally speaking, as long as the loan supports the foundation’s charitable mission and is not intended to primarily produce income or capital appreciation, it would qualify as a PRI.
PRIs offer a way for foundations to use their resources creatively, furthering their charitable goals while potentially recycling funds for future projects.
Conclusion
Private foundations can make loans, whether for charitable purposes or as investments, but they must ensure these loans comply with strict regulations. Investment loans must be financially sound, and foundations must avoid risky ventures that could jeopardize their mission. Additionally, all loans must adhere to self-dealing rules, meaning they cannot involve disqualified persons. By carefully adhering to these guidelines, private foundations can effectively utilize loans as a tool to advance their mission while staying in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Seeking expert guidance? We're here to help!
At CPA KPA, we're passionate about magnifying the positive impact of foundations. Feel free to reach out to us anytime at 888-402-1780 for a complimentary and obligation-free conversation. You can also conveniently submit your questions and inquiries through our contact page. Let's connect today and explore how we can help your foundation have a lasting and meaningful impact!
