Cash Flow Strategies for Private Foundations to Satisfy the 5% Distribution Mandate
Cash flow concerns for private foundations primarily revolve around the 5% distribution rule. This rule mandates that private foundations distribute a minimum of 5% of their endowment's value annually towards their charitable purposes.
To determine the required annual distribution, private foundations must perform a calculation based on the fair market value of their assets. Assets directly used for charitable activities, such as office equipment dedicated to the foundation’s mission, are excluded from this calculation. Additionally, the calculation involves subtracting 1.5% of the average annual value of the foundation's assets representing a cash reserve, as well as deducting amounts for federal taxes paid. The final figure typically results in a distribution requirement slightly below 5% of the average asset value.
This calculation is officially reported on the foundation's annual tax return, Form 990-PF. The foundation is required to complete the distribution by the end of the tax year following the one on which the calculation was based. For example, if the calculation uses average asset values from 2023, the distribution must be made by December 31, 2024. Failure to comply with the 5% distribution rule results in severe financial penalties.
Addressing Potential Cash Flow Challenges Amid Market Volatility
Achieving compliance with the 5% distribution requirement can become particularly challenging during bear markets in public equities. Problems arise when the value of endowment assets declines between the time the distribution amount is calculated and the time the distribution must be made. Since the required distribution is based on the previous year's average asset value, a sharp decline in market values can leave foundations with insufficient funds to meet their obligations. This may force them to sell investments during a bear market, potentially depleting their endowment in order to fulfill the distribution requirement. This predicament becomes particularly challenging when it comes to fulfilling multi-year pledges, as declining asset valuations make subsequent installment payments of the pledge financially burdensome.
Strategic Approaches to Meeting the 5% Distribution Requirement
Creating a Cushion with Excess Distributions
In years when a foundation distributes more than 5% of its assets, it can roll the excess amount forward for up to five years and apply the amount to help meet the distribution requirement in future years. As a conservative strategy, private foundations may wish to deliberately build up a carry-forward cushion, thereby reducing the pressure to make distributions during years when assets are underperforming. By establishing a cushion of excess distributions, foundations are better positioned to reduce grants during bear markets without jeopardizing their compliance. However, the trade-off is that by not holding onto assets longer, the foundation may miss out on potential investment returns.
Proactive Grantmaking During the Calculation Year
Another strategy, not unlike building up a cushion of distributions, is to make grants throughout the year in which the required distribution is being calculated. By performing ongoing estimates of the required 5% distribution during the calculation year and either making grants or setting aside cash accordingly, foundations can effectively meet the distribution requirement well in advance of the official deadline. For example, a foundation with an approximate $10 million endowment (going up and down in value during the year) might make the following quarterly estimates, then make grants or set aside reserve funds based on the estimates during each quarter:
• Q1: $10 million x 5% x ¼ = $125,000
• Q2: $11 million x 5% x ¼ = $137,500
• Q3: $9 million x 5% x ¼ = $112,500
• Q4: $8 million x 5% x ¼ = $100,000
Using this method, the foundation makes the grants or sets aside the funding during the calculation year. This is a conservative strategy, and it’s important to recognize that by divesting part of its assets ahead of the deadline, the foundation may forego potential investment returns that could have been realized if the assets were held longer.
Implementing a Flexible Grant Program
Another effective strategy to reduce cash flow risk is to establish a grant program that balances core and variable grants. The core grant program should be designed to remain sustainable even during market downturns, typically around 2.5% to 3% of the average endowment value. This ensures that essential grants can be funded reliably, regardless of economic conditions.
Alongside core grants, the foundation can implement a variable grant program that adjusts annually based on financial performance. In years of strong investment returns, more funds can be allocated to variable grants, allowing for increased charitable giving. Conversely, in years of poor performance, variable grants can be scaled back, preserving the foundation’s endowment and maintaining financial stability.
By balancing core and variable grants, private foundations can manage their obligations more effectively while adapting to changes in market conditions. This approach helps ensure that the foundation can continue to meet the 5% distribution requirement without jeopardizing its long-term financial health.
Using Put Options as a Safety Net
To protect against potential cash flow issues, foundations can consider using put options as an insurance safety net. Put options grant the holder the right to sell an asset at a predetermined price within a specified timeframe, effectively serving as insurance against declining asset values and significant market downturns. When the market drops, put options can offset losses, providing greater stability for the foundation in meeting its distribution requirements during volatile conditions.
However, put options come with a cost in the form of premiums, so they should be employed judiciously. It’s advisable to cover only a small portion of the overall portfolio and to use put options primarily when the foundation anticipates a heightened risk to its cash flow.
Diversifying Investments to Mitigate Risks
Investment diversification is another crucial strategy for protecting against unexpected cash flow challenges. By spreading their investments across different asset classes, industries, and geographic regions, foundations can reduce their exposure to any single market downturn. Diversification helps to minimize the impact of a bear market on overall portfolio performance and provides a buffer against significant declines in specific investments. This strategy allows foundations to maintain a more stable asset base and supports their ability to meet distribution requirements, even in challenging market conditions.
Leveraging a Line of Credit: Caution Required
For foundations facing cash flow challenges, establishing a lending relationship with a financial institution can be a viable strategy. This approach enables foundations to meet cash flow requirements like grant distributions without the need to sell assets at reduced prices during a market downturn. Distributions made from borrowed funds for charitable purposes qualify as legitimate distributions. However, it’s important to recognize that the repayment of borrowed funds does not count as a qualifying distribution.
While relying on a line of credit or borrowing can provide a temporary solution to immediate cash flow issues, it may also lead to greater problems if the underlying issues remain unresolved or if the market fails to recover from a downturn. Without careful management, this approach could exacerbate financial strain on the foundation.
Furthermore, it's crucial to thoroughly review the terms and requirements of any loan, including potential security interests and asset maintenance obligations. Special caution is warranted when considering margin loans on an investment portfolio, as they carry significant risk and require careful management. In the event of a margin call, the losses can be catastrophic.
Conclusion
In navigating the complexities of the 5% distribution requirement, private foundations can employ a variety of strategies to ensure compliance while safeguarding their financial health. By considering strategies like building distribution cushions, diversifying investments, and considering tools like put options and lines of credit, foundations can better withstand market volatility and sustain their charitable missions. Thoughtful planning and strategic flexibility are key to maintaining both regulatory compliance and long-term financial stability, allowing foundations to continue making a meaningful impact even in challenging economic conditions.
Seeking expert guidance? We're here to help!
At CPA KPA, we're passionate about magnifying the positive impact of foundations. Feel free to reach out to us anytime at 888-402-1780 for a complimentary and obligation-free conversation. You can also conveniently submit your questions and inquiries through our contact page. Let's connect today and explore how we can help your foundation have a lasting and meaningful impact!
