What are the differences between private foundations and donor-advised funds?
Philanthropy offers a variety of vehicles to support charitable endeavors, with private foundations and donor-advised funds (DAFs) among the most popular options. While both serve as powerful tools for giving, they differ significantly in terms of structure, flexibility, and the level of donor involvement they require. Private foundations provide a hands-on approach, offering complete control over governance, investments, and grantmaking, while DAFs excel in simplicity, privacy, and streamlined administration. Understanding these key distinctions enables donors to choose the option—or combination of options—that best aligns with their charitable goals, financial circumstances, and desire for involvement.
What is the case for private foundations?
Private foundations provide a robust platform for establishing a structured and enduring approach to philanthropy, emphasizing collaboration and teamwork. A private foundation offers the opportunity to create a distinct charitable entity with its own board of directors or trustees, an invested endowment, and the potential for paid employees. Unlike donor-advised funds, private foundations are standalone legal entities structured as nonprofit corporations or trusts, which gives donors complete control over the foundation's governance, investments, and grantmaking decisions. However, this flexible structure also means that private foundations come with increased administrative responsibilities and compliance obligations.
Within the structure of a private foundation, the composition of the team is flexible, spanning from immediate family members to a more expansive organizational structure. This structure can include well-developed operational systems, complete with a considerable workforce of hired employees, each playing specialized roles to ensure the foundation's effective functioning. The scale and sophistication of some of the largest foundations are nothing short of remarkable. Take, for instance, the Gates Foundation, which boasts over a thousand employees and harnesses cutting-edge operational methods and technology. Their rigorous approach entails not only substantial investment in evaluating potential grants but also meticulous monitoring of grant outcomes through careful record-keeping and thorough analysis. Naturally, many foundations operate on a more modest scale, with the majority being small entities driven by the original contributor and closely associated family members.
The organizational structure of a private foundation is highly adaptable. It can range from a small, family-run operation to a large-scale entity with professional staff and complex systems. For example, the Gates Foundation, with its over one thousand employees, exemplifies the potential sophistication of a private foundation. Using advanced operational methods and technology, it rigorously evaluates grant proposals and meticulously monitors outcomes through detailed record-keeping and analysis.
At the same time, most private foundations operate on a smaller scale, typically involving close-knit family members who oversee its mission and activities. Whether large or small, private foundations provide donors with unparalleled opportunities to shape a charitable organization tailored to their vision, creating a legacy that can endure for generations.
What is the case for donor-advised funds?
Donor-advised funds are particularly appealing to philanthropists seeking a simplified and more individual-focused approach to charitable giving. Typically, a DAF centers on a single donor or a married couple, who retain the authority to recommend grants. While it is possible to involve additional individuals—such as the donor's adult children—each participant typically has equal influence and can independently make recommendations. However, it is important to note that donors to DAFs hold advisory privileges rather than full control. The sponsoring organization retains legal authority over grant distributions, meaning DAFs offer less direct control compared to private foundations.
DAFs offer a streamlined approach to philanthropy that significantly reduces administrative burdens for donors. The sponsoring organization manages all compliance, record-keeping, and operational tasks, allowing donors to focus on recommending grants without the complexities of direct management. This simplicity comes with certain limitations. DAFs cannot hire employees or incur operating expenses, such as conducting due diligence on potential grantees. They are also restricted to making grants to U.S.-based public charities and cannot fund individuals or engage in program-related investments. Consequently, the grantmaking process with a DAF is typically less rigorous than that of a private foundation, often resembling a straightforward check-writing exercise.
DAFs are particularly appealing for their streamlined setup process, cost-effective administration, and more favorable tax deduction rules. They also stand out for their ability to provide privacy. Contributions and grants made through DAFs are aggregated in the sponsoring organization’s filings rather than being individually disclosed, and DAFs generally allow for anonymous grants. This level of discretion is not typically possible with private foundations, which are subject to public disclosure requirements through Form 990-PF. Donors using DAFs can often choose anonymity on a grant-by-grant basis, making them a flexible and private tool for philanthropy.
Features of Private Foundations
• Robust Organizational Structure: Private foundations provide a formal legal framework for creating an enduring organization that allows for deep family involvement, often extending across generations. They can establish large scale operations, frequently including hired personnel and specialized roles, enabling them to manage large-scale charitable activities effectively.
• Lesser Tax Deductibility of Contributions: Private foundations can receive charitable contributions at any time, allowing donors to claim tax deductions. However, these deductions are subject to more stringent limits compared to donor-advised funds: Cash contributions are deductible up to 30% of Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) while appreciated securities are deductible up to 20% of AGI. Any unused deduction carried forward for up to five years.
• Larger Endowments and Substantial Gifts: Private foundations often maintain larger endowments and are better positioned to attract significant contributions from family members, close affiliates, and even unrelated third parties.
• Flexible Grantmaking Options: Foundations have unparalleled flexibility in grantmaking, with options that extend beyond public charities. They can provide funding to international charities, offer scholarships or emergency assistance to individuals, and make program-related investments (PRIs) that directly align with the foundation’s mission.
• Greater Control Over Investments: Foundations offer complete control over the allocation of their endowment investments. Donors can diversify across public securities, private equity, hedge funds, and even privately held businesses. This contrasts with donor-advised funds which typically limit investment options to pre-selected pools or funds chosen by the sponsoring organization.
• Annual Distribution Requirements: Foundations must distribute approximately 5% of their non-charitable asset base each year, excluding program-related investments and assets directly used for charitable purposes. Failure to meet this requirement can result in significant IRS penalties and excise taxes.
• Excise Tax on Net Investment Income: Although private foundations are exempt from standard income taxes, they are required to pay a 1.39% excise tax on their net investment income, which includes dividends, interest, capital gains, and similar earnings.
• Administrative and Operational Responsibilities: Foundations are responsible for covering their own administrative and operational costs, which vary based on the size and scope of their activities.
• Annual Filings and Public Disclosure: Foundations are required to file an annual tax return, Form 990-PF, which provides detailed information about their financial activities, grant recipients, and governance. This form is publicly accessible, offering transparency into the foundation’s operations. This level of public access promotes accountability but offers less privacy compared to donor-advised funds.
Features of Donor-Advised Funds
• Uncomplicated and Cost-Effective Giving: DAFs excel as simple and affordable options for charitable contributions. While they are not designed for building substantial organizational structures, donors retain advisory privileges, allowing them to make personalized recommendations on grant distributions.
• Simplified Setup Process: Establishing a DAF is quick and easy, often requiring an initial contribution as low as $1,000. Compared to the more complex process of setting up a private foundation, DAFs are far simpler to establish.
• Lower Administrative Costs: Managing a DAF is notably straightforward, as the sponsoring organization handles compliance, record-keeping, and other operational tasks. While administrative costs are typically lower than those of private foundations, fees may vary depending on the sponsoring organization.
• Greater Tax Deductibility of Contributions: DAFs offer the flexibility to accept additional contributions at any time, providing donors with ongoing opportunities to claim tax deductions. While it is uncommon for anyone other than the founder to contribute to a DAF, the tax benefits for contributions are more favorable compared to private foundations. Cash contributions to a DAF are deductible up to 60% of Adjusted Gross Income (AGI), and donations of appreciated securities are deductible up to 30% of AGI. Any unused deduction can be carried forward for up to five years.
• Lesser Grantmaking Authority: Donors to DAFs hold advisory privileges, allowing them to recommend grants to U.S.-based public charities. Although the sponsoring organization typically honors these recommendations, it retains final legal control over all grant distributions. Unlike private foundations, DAFs are restricted in grantmaking scope—they cannot make international grants, provide funding to individuals, or engage in program-related investments.
• Less Expansive Investment Options: The investment choices available to DAFs are typically more limited than those for private foundations. Sponsoring organizations often offer pre-selected pools or funds, restricting the degree of customization available to donors.
• No Mandatory Payout Requirements: Unlike private foundations, DAFs are not required to meet an annual minimum payout obligation. This flexibility allows donors to distribute funds on their own timeline. Some sponsoring organizations, however, encourage donors to maintain an active grantmaking schedule to ensure consistent charitable impact.
• Increased Privacy and Anonymity: DAFs offer donors a greater degree of privacy. Contributions and grants are aggregated in the sponsoring organization’s filings rather than being disclosed individually. Donors can sometimes choose whether their gifts are confidential or publicly acknowledged on a grant-by-grant basis. However, creating a completely untraceable gift can be difficult, as extensive external research may reveal donor identities in certain cases.
Which Vehicle Suits You Best?
Private foundations and donor-advised funds each offer unique advantages, making them valuable tools for philanthropy. The right choice depends on your specific circumstances and goals, as both approaches have considerable merit. Private foundations are well-suited for those seeking maximum control, long-term family involvement, and the ability to engage in diverse philanthropic activities, such as funding individuals or international charities. In contrast, DAFs are ideal for those who prioritize simplicity, flexibility, and privacy, benefiting from lower administrative burdens and higher tax deduction limits.
Importantly, the decision does not have to be an "either-or" choice. Many philanthropists strategically combine the strengths of both mechanisms. For instance, donors seeking to maximize tax deductions in a given year can allocate a portion of their contributions to a private foundation, taking advantage of its ability to manage large-scale philanthropy, while directing additional contributions to a DAF to benefit from its more favorable deduction limits.
In addition, private foundations can enhance their philanthropic reach by integrating DAFs into their strategy. While a well-defined mission helps foundations focus their efforts and amplify their impact, this mission does not need to limit flexibility. Donors can use DAFs to manage off-mission grants, thereby reducing the likelihood of non-mission-related requests being directed at the foundation. DAFs also provide a way for foundations to maintain confidentiality for certain grants, such as those involving sensitive or controversial causes. This dual approach allows donors to optimize their giving while managing public perception effectively.
Ultimately, the decision between a private foundation and a DAF—or a combination of both—depends on your personal aspirations and philanthropic goals. By carefully evaluating the distinct advantages of each option and leveraging their complementary strengths, donors can craft a well-rounded strategy that maximizes their impact and leaves a lasting legacy.
Seeking expert guidance? We're here to help!
At CPA KPA, we're passionate about magnifying the positive impact of private foundations. Feel free to reach out to us anytime at 888-402-1780 for a complimentary and obligation-free conversation. You can also conveniently submit your questions and inquiries through our contact page. Let's connect today and explore how we can help your foundation have a lasting and meaningful impact!