Can private foundations pay family members of their founders or leaders?
Private foundations can pay family members of the founder and other disqualified persons under certain conditions, thanks to exceptions in the self-dealing rules outlined in the Internal Revenue Code. However, the process is carefully regulated and there are many rules and stringent guidelines that must be followed to ensure compliance.
Understanding the Rules on Compensation
Private foundations are subject to self-dealing rules—strict regulations aimed at preventing situations that could compromise their commitment to serving the public good. These rules specifically govern interactions with "disqualified persons," a category that includes substantial contributors (e.g., the foundation’s founder), foundation managers (such as officers, directors, or trustees), and their family members (including spouses, ancestors, children, grandchildren, and their spouses). Disqualified persons are subject to heightened scrutiny under these rules, particularly when it comes to receiving compensation. While hiring family members is allowed, it must meet strict criteria to ensure compliance with these regulations.
Family members can serve as directors, executives, or staff members of a foundation, provided their roles contribute meaningfully to the foundation’s operations and charitable mission. To comply with the Internal Revenue Code, these positions must fall under the category of "personal services," which the IRS defines narrowly. The term specifically includes white-collar roles such as general management, legal services, accounting, banking, and investment management. Furthermore, the work must be substantive, and the individual must have the appropriate qualifications to perform the duties effectively.
Positions outside these areas, such as manual labor or technical work, generally do not meet the requirements of this exception. For example, compensating a family member for providing legal advice to the foundation would be permissible under the rules, whereas paying a family member for groundskeeping services would violate self-dealing regulations.
Ensuring Reasonable Compensation
Compensation for family members must be reasonable and comparable to market rates for similar roles. This determination considers several factors, including job responsibilities, required skills, time commitment, and the foundation’s size and scope. Excessive compensation, even if unintentional, can result in severe penalties.
Several factors influence what constitutes reasonable compensation for foundation leadership and staff. Key considerations include the foundation’s endowment size, grantmaking methods, total grant amounts, and the salaries offered by similar organizations for comparable roles. Geographic location, the level of specialized expertise required, and the complexity and scope of the foundation’s operations also play a significant role. Ultimately, there is no definitive formula for determining fair compensation; it depends on the specific facts and circumstances of each role.
To establish reasonable compensation, many foundations consult external experts, such as compensation consultants, who analyze marketplace data and provide benchmarking insights. Foundations should also consider industry surveys, IRS Form 990-PF data from comparable organizations, and best practices for non-profit governance.
Employing Family Members: Balancing Practicality, Ethics, and Transparency
Compensating family members in private foundations can be a delicate balancing act, intertwining practical considerations with ethical obligations and the need for transparency. While family members often bring unique insights, passion, and familiarity with the foundation's mission, employing them can raise concerns about fairness and public perception.
Family members often have a deep understanding of the foundation's mission, making them well-suited for leadership and operational roles. Their involvement can foster continuity and a strong sense of purpose, particularly in multi-generational foundations where the founder's legacy is a priority. In complex foundations, where professional expertise is required in areas such as grant administration, compliance, or program management, hiring family members can be a great way to enhance efficiency and impact. However, employing family members is a choice and not a necessity. Many private foundations rely on volunteer contributions from family members to minimize administrative costs and direct more resources toward charitable activities. The decision to compensate family members should be made based on the foundation's specific needs, the scope of its operations, and the qualifications of the individuals involved.
That said, employing family members can attract scrutiny, especially if it appears that personal gain takes precedence over the public good. Transparency is crucial to countering such concerns. Demonstrating that hiring decisions and compensation are based on the foundation’s legitimate needs and aligned with market standards can help mitigate concerns of impropriety. Foundations should be prepared to explain how these decisions support their mission and align with their charitable objectives.
To minimize risks of conflicts of interest or allegations of self-dealing, private foundations should implement robust policies and safeguards. A comprehensive conflict of interest policy is essential, requiring decision-makers to disclose potential conflicts and recuse themselves from discussions or decisions involving the employment or compensation of family members. Thorough documentation—such as records of hiring decisions, compensation agreements, and performance evaluations—is equally important for substantiating that these choices are merit-based and consistent with market norms. Lastly, engaging independent experts, such as compensation consultants, can further enhance objectivity and ensure practices remain reasonable and transparent.
Consequences of Noncompliance
Improperly compensating family members can result in severe financial penalties, including excise taxes on both the individuals involved and the foundation managers responsible. In addition to these penalties, any excessive compensation must be returned to the foundation to resolve the issue.
Private foundations are established to serve the public good with a charitable mission, not the private interests of family members. If family members abuse their roles for personal gain, both the foundation and the individuals involved risk substantial monetary consequences and potential damage to the foundation’s tax-exempt status. Egregious violations could even threaten the foundation’s continued existence.
Seeking expert guidance? We're here to help!
At CPA KPA, we're passionate about magnifying the positive impact of foundations. Feel free to reach out to us anytime at 888-402-1780 for a complimentary and obligation-free conversation. You can also conveniently submit your questions and inquiries through our contact page. Let's connect today and explore how we can help your foundation have a lasting and meaningful impact!